Loading Now

AI Case Prompt Results for SMU

AI Case Prompt Results for SMU

Here is the prompt for getting case citations:

<proposition>
"Ordinarily, the government should not interfere with the parenting decisions of fit parents."
</proposition>

You are a Texas family law litigation attorney writing a brief addressing the above proposition.

Create a comprehensive list of Texas family law and U.S. Supreme court citations that might address the above proposition

For each citation:
1. Provide the full citation in proper Bluebook format
2. Include a brief description of what the citation contains
3. Explain why it might be relevant to the proposition

Format the citations as a table having the following columns:
1. ā€œcitation_textā€: ā€œTex. Fam. Code § 6.002ā€
2. ā€œdescriptionā€: ā€œPlaceholder for brief description of what citation containsā€
3. ā€œrelevanceā€: ā€œPlaceholder for explanation of why the cited source might be relevantā€

Sample Out from Claude.ai

Verification Prompt

<proposition>
"Ordinarily, the government should not interfere with the parenting decisions of fit parents."
</proposition>

For each of the citations in the table you just provided, verify if it directly supports or refutes the above proposition.

For each citation:
1. Recall the specific holding or statutory language. If you cannot recall, Flag as "UNABLE TO VERIFY"
Ā Ā 2. Rate your confidence in your recall (High/Medium/Low)
Ā Ā 3. If the specific holding or statutory language directly addresses the proposition, include a Flag saying "SUPPORTS" or "REFUTES" the proposition
Ā Ā 4. If the specific holding or statutory language does NOT directly address the proposition, Flag it as "NOT RELEVANT"
Ā Ā 5. Explain exactly how it supports or refutes the proposition
Ā Ā 6. Mark any citations you cannot verify with specific details as "UNABLE TO VERIFY" in the "verification" fieldĀ Ā 

Format your response as a table having the following columns:
Ā Ā  1. ā€œcitation_textā€: "Tex. Fam. Code § 6.002",
Ā Ā  2. ā€œholdingā€: ā€œPlaceholder holding or statutory language that makes this citation relevantā€,
Ā Ā  3. ā€œconfidenceā€: ā€œLowā€,
Ā Ā  4. ā€œflagā€: ā€œREFUTESā€,
Ā Ā  5. ā€œanalysisā€: ā€œPlaceholder explanation of how the cited source supports or refutes this proposition. Blank if unable to verify the cited source.ā€,
Ā Ā  6. ā€œverificationā€: ā€œPlaceholder for VERIFIED or UNABLE TO VERIFY with brief explanationā€

Sample Output from Claude.Ai